All large corporations begin small, with a vision and strategy. The Small Business Investment Company (SBIC) program provides loans to private equity funds licensed by the U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) to help finance promising young companies across the country. Funds are able to borrow up to $150 million in low interest loans from the government to invest in the market. Once small businesses like Apple Computer, Buffalo Wild Wings and Costco have all benefitted from SBIC financing over the years.
In Ohio, the program has been especially impactful. According to the Small Business Investor Alliance (SBIA), SBIC-leveraged funds have invested approximately $500 million in over 100 Ohio companies during the past eight years alone. These small businesses operate in critical industries like manufacturing, technology and healthcare. Despite the potential benefit of SBIC financing, however, Ohio has not historically been an ideal tax climate for SBIC-leveraged funds because of the Financial Institutions Tax, or FIT.
The FIT is a tax levied on the apportioned equity capital or net worth of banks, bank holding companies, trust companies, nonbank small dollar lenders, certain savings and loans companies, and other similar institutions previously subject to the Ohio Corporate Franchise Tax. Insurance companies, credit unions and dealers in intangibles are financial services providers generally exempt from the FIT, which became effective January 1, 2014, upon the passage of HB 510.
The rate used to calculate FIT liability varies with the size of the taxpayer. A rate of 0.8% is applied to the first $200 million in taxable capital, 0.4% for capital in excess of $200 million but less than $1.3 billion, and 0.25% for capital in excess of $1.3 billion. For SBIC-leveraged funds, the FIT represents a potentially significant cash outflow and expense.
Interestingly, the applicability of the FIT to SBIC-leveraged funds appears to have been an oversight lost amidst the significant revisions to Ohio’s tax code included in HB 510, especially the introduction of the Ohio Commercial Activity Tax. Once the Ohio General Assembly recognized the issue, a proposed change to the definition of “financial institution,” excluding SBIC-leveraged funds, was introduced by state Rep. Derek Merrin in HB 592. Language in that bill was incorporated into another piece of legislation in late 2016 and ultimately passed, becoming effective retroactively in 2017. Any SBIC Fund adversely impacted by the issue could seek a refund from the state. The SBIA and other industry proponents heralded the legislative change.
You’ve heard our thoughts… We’d like to hear yours
The Schneider Downs Our Thoughts On blog exists to create a dialogue on issues that are important to organizations and individuals. While we enjoy sharing our ideas and insights, we’re especially interested in what you may have to say. If you have a question or a comment about this article – or any article from the Our Thoughts On blog – we hope you’ll share it with us. After all, a dialogue is an exchange of ideas, and we’d like to hear from you. Email us at [email protected].
Material discussed is meant for informational purposes only, and it is not to be construed as investment, tax, or legal advice. Please note that individual situations can vary. Therefore, this information should be relied upon when coordinated with individual professional advice.
This site uses cookies to ensure that we give you the best user experience. Cookies assist in navigation, analyzing traffic and in our marketing efforts as described in our Privacy Policy.