Freight Exception from Business Privilege Tax

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court issued a ruling in favor of S&H Transport, Inc. in its business privilege tax (BPT) dispute with the City of York over the exclusion of freight delivery and transportation charges.

S&H is a freight broker that arranges transportation of goods for sellers for a fee.  S&H matches sellers of goods with common carriers in order to ship the seller’s goods.  Once the goods have been shipped, S&H invoices the seller for the shipping costs of the common carrier and its commission.  S&H then remits the shipping costs to the common carrier and keeps its commission. The dispute began when S&H was audited by York, and the city disallowed S&H’s deduction of shipping fees collected on behalf of carriers.

The dispute turned on the interpretation of York’s BPT regulations and the Local Tax Enabling Act (LTEA).  The LTEA contains an exclusion for, “charges advanced by a seller for freight, delivery or other transportation for the purchaser in accordance with the terms of a contract of sale.”  York’s BPT regulation, on the other hand, excludes “freight delivery or transportation charges paid by the seller for the purchaser.”  The city argued that S&H was not a “seller” by definition, but the Court ruled there was sufficient ambiguity to rule in favor of S&H.

The Court ultimately decided that the exclusion provided by the city’s regulation was broader than the exclusion allowed under the LTEA.  As a result, the city must allow S&H a deduction of shipping costs it “paid” to common carriers.  The Court’s reasoning was based on the regulation and the fact that the language in the regulation did not limit the exclusion to sellers of goods as argued by the city.  The benefit of this ruling is likely limited to freight brokers or businesses with very similar fact patterns to S&H that are located in a city with an exception written in the same manner as York’s.

For more information about this case or business privilege tax issues, contact a member of the Schneider Downs’ State and Local Tax Team.   

You’ve heard our thoughts… We’d like to hear yours

The Schneider Downs Our Thoughts On blog exists to create a dialogue on issues that are important to organizations and individuals. While we enjoy sharing our ideas and insights, we’re especially interested in what you may have to say. If you have a question or a comment about this article – or any article from the Our Thoughts On blog – we hope you’ll share it with us. After all, a dialogue is an exchange of ideas, and we’d like to hear from you. Email us at [email protected].

Material discussed is meant for informational purposes only, and it is not to be construed as investment, tax, or legal advice. Please note that individual situations can vary. Therefore, this information should be relied upon when coordinated with individual professional advice.

© 2023 Schneider Downs. All rights-reserved. All content on this site is property of Schneider Downs unless otherwise noted and should not be used without written permission.

our thoughts on
Contractors May Benefit From SALT Cap Workaround
The Push for Electric Vehicle Utilization and Some Challenges that Lie Ahead
New Pennsylvania Annual Report Filing Requirement
PA PIT Section 179 Deduction
OHIO H.B. 33 Contains Significant Tax Changes
EPA Loads More Regulatory Burden on Big Transportation
Register to receive our weekly newsletter with our most recent columns and insights.
Have a question? Ask us!

We’d love to hear from you. Drop us a note, and we’ll respond to you as quickly as possible.

Ask us
contact us
Pittsburgh

This site uses cookies to ensure that we give you the best user experience. Cookies assist in navigation, analyzing traffic and in our marketing efforts as described in our Privacy Policy.

×